Amount of inconsistencies in incidents AUM is huge, like a mountain

Uodzumi Akira

Excerpt from an article Uodzumi Akira "Various concerns about the "incidents AUM" floated up of the protocols legal proceedings", the magazine "Shukan Gendai" № 57.

***

There is a theme for which the 10-plus years I had hesitation whether to write about it or not. This is a hidden part of the series of incidents made ​​by Aum Shinrikyo. While the former defendant Shoko Asahara was sentenced to death, amount of inconsistencies in incidents AUM  is huge, like a mountain.


For example, one of them. Police discovered that Aum sarin appeared about six months before sarin incidents in Metro (March 1995). Because of that the in village Kamikuisiki (name at the time) in Yamanashi Prefecture rose hype about the smell of sarin, as result of investigation, in a drainage ditch of AUM building were founded the degradation products of sarin. This was the ultimate proof of the involvement of the organization to sarin incident in Matsumoto in June 1994.

However, the police not decided not to compulsory investigation, which resulted sarin incidents in the subway. Why did the police have behaved so strangely? As far as I know, no one to solve this problem as yet.


Uodzumi Akira, "Shukan Gendai" № 57
About the author: http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 鱼 住 昭